Sunday, November 27, 2005

San Diego



 

Saturday, November 26, 2005

Wildcats = Losers





ASU: 23





U of A: 20








Is there anything those MildCats don't suck at?


"Losers always whine about their best. Winners go home and f*** the prom queen"
(John Mason - The Rock)


 

Tuesday, November 15, 2005

Saturday, November 12, 2005

Kansas

The Bad News: The Kansas School Board voted to teach Intelligent Design and downplay Evolution in their science classes.

The Good News: Now that people in Kansas don't think that they are related to their farm animals, they won't feel guilty when they have sex with them.

 

Monday, November 07, 2005

Mystery Men Quote Of The Day

"The police ruled my father's death a suicide. They said he fell down an elevator shaft, onto some bullets."

(The Bowler)

 

Saturday, November 05, 2005

Sabino Canyon



We went hiking up at Sabino Canyon earlier today. Sorry to keep this post short but I gotta go clean the dirt stuck up my butt crack :-/

 

Thursday, November 03, 2005

Intelligent Design My Ass

Lately, the whole argument of allowing forcing science teachers to teach Intelligent Design in science classes has been all over the news. The proponents of Intelligent Design do not believe in Evolution and Natural selection, instead they claim that life of earth is too complicated to have evolved without the help of some "higher being". Using the rules of philosophy that I learned in my Philosophy 101 class, the argument provided by the supporters of Intelligent Desgin can be written as:

- Premise #1: Life exists on earth.
- Premise #2: Life is too complicated to be explained by Evolution
- Conclusion: Life must be created by some "Higher Being"

This is a logically invalid argument. The premise provides no support for the conclusion whatsoever. Basically, they are pulling the conclusion out of thin air.

I consider myself a scientist (hey, computer science is a science, isn't it?) and I try to keep an open mind about everything. People have every right to question Evolution, but claiming Intelligent Design as science is against everything that science stands for. Evolution is supported by DNA, carbon dating, fossil samples, continental drift etc etc, and on the other hand, Intelligent Design is supported by... well, actually, it is not supported by anything! Sorry, but just because your religious text books says so doesn't hold any weight when it comes to science. Intelligent Design and Creationism is a religious philosophy, NOT a science and should be kept away from our science classes. If they do ever come up with some evidence that negates what Evolution is claiming, I will be more than happy to listen to it with an open mind, but till then, all I ask for them is to take their BS and shove it up their religious ass.